SCHD vs VYM: two dividend ETFs, two different strategies.
SCHD and VYM are the two largest dividend-focused ETFs in the US. They both pay dividend income above the S&P 500 average. They are not the same fund in different packaging. The selection methodologies, sector mix, and 10-year rolling returns diverge in ways that matter for what you actually own.
This page covers personal finance fundamentals that apply regardless of your view on Bitcoin or fiat currencyfiat currencyMoney declared legal tender by a government, not backed by a physical commodity. Its value rests on trust in the issuing government.Full definition.
SCHD screens for high-quality dividend growers using a quality-screen methodology from Dow Jones. VYM tracks all higher-than-average US dividend payers with no quality screen. SCHD has a heavier weight in defensive sectors (consumer staples, healthcare) and a noticeably lower exposure to financials. VYM has more financials and slightly more cyclical sectors. Both pay yields in the 3-4% range. Over the trailing 10 years, SCHD has had the slight edge on total return; VYM has the slight edge on simplicity. Neither one belongs in a tax-deferred account if you are accumulating; both make sense in a tax-deferred retirement account for income-stage holders.
Side by side
| ETF | ISSUER | ER | YIELD | HOLDINGS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | Schwab | 0.06% | ~3.6% | 100 |
| VYM | Vanguard | 0.06% | ~3.0% | ~440 |
Yields fluctuate with both dividend payments and underlying price. Verify current values at each issuer's site.
Selection methodology
SCHD: quality screen
SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. The index applies a multi-step quality screen verify×DON'T TRUST, VERIFYClaim: SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index using a multi-factor quality screen.Verify at: Schwab SCHD page ↗ · Dow Jones methodology ↗Index methodology is publicly documented by S&P Dow Jones Indices. Confirm against the methodology PDF before relying on this.:
- Universe: US companies with at least 10 consecutive years of dividend payments.
- Filter: cash-flow-to-debt ratio, return on equity, dividend yield, and 5-year dividend growth rate, each ranked.
- Top 100 by composite score, weighted by dividend yield, capped at 4% per holding and 25% per sector.
- Annual reconstitution in March.
VYM: broad above-average yield
VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The selection is simpler: take all US dividend-paying stocks, exclude REITsReal Estate Investment Trust (REIT)A company that owns income-producing real estate and must distribute at least 90% of taxable income as dividends. REIT dividends are taxed as ordinary income, not the lower qualified dividend rate, making REITs most efficient in tax-advantaged accounts., rank by forecast 12-month dividend yield, take the top 50% by aggregate yield. Cap-weighted within. The result is approximately 440 holdings, much broader than SCHD, with no explicit quality screen and no consecutive-payment requirement.
Sector overlap and concentration
The two funds have a substantial overlap (roughly 70% of SCHD holdings appear in VYM) but with very different weights. Approximate sector mix as of May 2026:
- Consumer Staples: SCHD ~18% · VYM ~9%
- Health Care: SCHD ~16% · VYM ~14%
- Financials: SCHD ~17% · VYM ~22%
- Industrials: SCHD ~13% · VYM ~10%
- Information Technology: SCHD ~12% · VYM ~12%
- Energy: SCHD ~7% · VYM ~9%
Sector weights drift between rebalances. Verify against the current fact sheet at the issuer's site.
SCHD's overweight in defensive sectors (Consumer Staples, Health Care) and underweight in Financials gives it lower correlation with broad market drawdowns. VYM's heavier weight in Financials and Cyclicals makes it more market-like.
10-year rolling returns
SCHD launched in October 2011; VYM launched in November 2006. Over their joint history (2011-2026), the 10-year rolling total returns have favored SCHD by a small but persistent margin verify×DON'T TRUST, VERIFYClaim: SCHD's 10-year trailing total return has averaged ~0.5-1.5% higher than VYM through May 2026.Verify at: Portfolio Visualizer ↗ · Total Real Returns ↗Both ETFs publish total return data on their fund pages. Confirm specific window before publishing.:
- 5-year (CAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)The average yearly growth rate of an investment, assuming profits are reinvested each year.): SCHD ~10.5% · VYM ~9.8%
- 10-year (CAGR): SCHD ~11.4% · VYM ~9.9%
- S&P 500 comparison: 10-year CAGR ~12.5% (both dividend ETFs trail in absolute return but with higher dividend yield)
The total-return picture: SCHD has slightly outperformed VYM, both have slightly underperformed broad market (S&P 500) over the last decade. The dividend-focused approach gives up some total return for the income tilt.
Dividend growth rates
For income-stage investors, the rate at which dividends grow over time matters more than the current yield.
- SCHD 10-year dividend CAGR: approximately 11%. The quality-screen methodology means SCHD systematically tilts toward dividend growers.
- VYM 10-year dividend CAGR: approximately 6-7%. The yield-focused methodology captures high payers but doesn't filter for growth.
The compounding implication over a 20-year retirement: a dividend stream growing at 11% doubles roughly every 6.5 years; a stream at 6.5% doubles every 11 years. Over a long retirement that's a meaningfully different income trajectory.
Tax efficiency
Both funds distribute qualified dividends from US corporations, taxed at long-term capital gainscapital gainsThe profit from selling an asset for more than you paid for it. Taxed differently depending on how long you held the asset. rates (0/15/20) at the federal level. The 3-4% yield is more than triple what an S&P 500 fund pays. In a taxable account this is an annual drag relative to a growth-tilted strategy.
In an IRAIndividual Retirement Account (IRA)A personal retirement savings account with tax advantages. Two main types: Traditional (tax now, pay later) and Roth (pay now, tax-free forever).Full definition or 401(k), dividends are not currently taxable. SCHD and VYM are most tax-efficient when held in tax-advantaged accounts. For accumulators in their 30s and 40s in taxable accounts, broad-market funds (VTI, FZROX, VOO) typically generate less current tax drag.
Who should hold each
- Pick SCHD if: you want a quality-screened dividend strategy with stronger historical dividend growth, lower financials exposure, and a willingness to accept slightly higher single-stock concentration (top 10 holdings ~40% of fund).
- Pick VYM if: you prefer broader diversificationdiversificationSpreading investments across different assets so a drop in one doesn't devastate your entire portfolio.Full definition across 440 holdings, simpler methodology, and acceptance of slower dividend growth in exchange for a slightly higher initial yield in some periods.
- Pick neither if: you are an accumulator (under 50, building wealth, not yet drawing income). Both fund types create unnecessary current-tax drag versus broad-market accumulation funds.
Common questions
Can I hold both SCHD and VYM?
Yes, but the overlap is high and the marginal diversification benefit is small. Most income-focused investors pick one and stick with it.
Are dividends safer than capital gains in retirement?
There's a behavioral case (dividend payments feel more like income, easier to budget) and a financial counter-case (total return is what matters; dividends and selling appreciated shares are economically equivalent). The behavioral case is real and worth weighing if it keeps you from selling at the bottom of a drawdown.
How do these compare with VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation)?
VIG screens for dividend growers (10+ years of consecutive increases) without the yield filter SCHD applies. VIG typically has a lower yield (~1.7%) and somewhat better total return characteristics. Between SCHD and VIG it comes down to whether you want current yield (SCHD) or future growth (VIG).
Should retirees use a dividend ETF instead of a bond fund?
Not as a substitute. Dividend equity is still equity and drops with the market; bonds provide actual diversification of risk. A retirement portfolio holding both has the income from one and the volatility protection of the other. Bonds are not "yield substitutes" for dividend stocks; they are a distinct asset class.
Is there a Bitcoin equivalent of these?
No. Bitcoin doesn't pay dividends. Some Bitcoin yield strategies (lending platforms, "Bitcoin-paying" stocks) exist but carry counterparty risk that traditional dividend ETFs don't have. See Bitcoin allocation for how Bitcoin fits alongside dividend strategies in a retirement portfolio.
Related reading
- VOO vs SPY vs IVV · the S&P 500 comparison
- Index funds
- Broader index fund comparison
- Bonds explainer
- FIRE · how withdrawal strategies interact with dividend vs total-return frameworks
- Schwab Asset Management, SCHD fund page · schwabassetmanagement.com
- Vanguard, VYM fund page · vanguard.com
- S&P Dow Jones Indices, Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 methodology · spglobal.com
- FTSE Russell, FTSE High Dividend Yield Index methodology · ftserussell.com
- SEC EDGAR, Form N-1A filings for SCHD and VYM · sec.gov/edgar
Last updated 2026-05-08. Not financial advice. Do your own research.
Subscribe via RSS for new articles.